Skip to content

Category: Tools and Technology

Flickr-ish Goodness

After spending the day playing with my new tech-toys, I’ve loaded photos into Flickr (while listening to the radio, no less). Then I ran around trying to figure out the Flickr identities of anyone I could think of and making them into contacts (still can’t find some people that I KNOW have accounts, but I’ll keep sleuthing). What fun!

I’m still a little miffed that it doesn’t let me order the photos on the main page my way, or if there is a way to do that I haven’t figured it out. But hey, I’ll live. Let the photo sharing begin!

Now my little head is buzzing with ideas for using my camera and Flickr account in the library. The possibilities are endless… though as yet un-articulated. All I know is that this could be FUN. The first things that came to mind were kind of pedestrian (things like creating illustrations for my web pages or instruction sessions). But now I’m wondering if there is any way to work this in to the idea that some co-workers and I have. We want to build social communities around research. We want communities that have an online space that allows for sharing, helping, commiserating, discussing, and generally HAVING FUN (are you catching my theme?). We have no concrete plans, but when has that ever stopped us? So anyway, I’m wondering if there’s some way to work the visual into all of this. Has anyone else tried this sort of thing? What did you do? What worked? What didn’t work? Are you still sane?

Well, after a long day of doing absolutely nothing, it’s time for P and me to wind down.

1 Comment

Google Spreadsheet Sharing

I haven’t played very much with Google Spreadsheets, yet, but I did share a test sheet with my co-workers, and it seems that I’ve given them automatic access to the beta test. So if anyone wants to have a peek, email me or leave me a comment (only gmail accounts work, though, so be sure you have one of those first [Update: I can get you one of those gmail accounts, too, if you need one. Just drop me a line or a comment]).

Comments closed

Audience Level Information

When I was at Computers in Libraries this year I saw Lorcan Dempsey’s presentation on “Exploiting the Value of Structured Metadata” (ppt slideshow) in which he showed a Greasemonkey script that inserts audience level information into Amazon records. At the time I just filed it way in the “huh, that’s interesting” part of my brain, but today it’s consumed more time than I’d prefer.

The backstory: At MPOW the Reference & Instruction librarians are responsible for collecting for the reference collection. Faculty members do most of our collecting for the main collection (with help from both an automated system and our collection development department), but the R&I librarians select the reference books. Well, it’s coming up on the end of the fiscal year and it seems that we’ve all been too busy to think much about this part of our jobs. I can’t speak for my colleagues’ organizational and piling skills, but I had a hanging file full of “unprocessed” (by which I mean “I haven’t looked at these at all”) Choice cards, Blackwell slips, and promotional postcards. Then I had a stack about 6 inches deep of catalogs and the larger promotional mailings. Most of you don’t know me and my office, but I don’t tend to let things pile up. I’m one of those who deals with things and then either files or throws them away.

So this was really starting to get on my nerves, but it just wasn’t very high on my priority list compared to all the other things I’ve been doing lately. Not only that, but I don’t consider this the most enjoyable part of being a librarian. I just don’t have enough of a sense of how to select the “good” stuff sight-unseen, and I don’t yet have a feel for the reference “gaps” for my liaison areas to go out and look for stuff (except that I know I want more encyclopedias and dictionaries for Asian literature, and specialized dictionaries in a couple of languages, but they’re pretty hard to come by).

To make a long ramble shorter, it turns out that we all need to concentrate on this task and spend our budget before next Tuesday afternoon or else the money disappears, so we’re all sitting in front of Amazon and sorting through catalogs and review cards and looking distinctly annoyed. I’m not sure if unsuspecting patrons would get better reference help today because we all want to do anything other than what we have to do, or if they’d get worse service because we’re all in such disgruntled moods. (On the up-side, I found a 272-page monograph on the history and development of the ellipsis… who knew?)

Anyway, I thought that this Greasemonkey script would really help me as I sorted through specialized dictionaries. I needed some clue, any clue, about how comprehensive and scholarly the works were. So I installed the Greasemonkey Firefox extension, installed the Amazon script, and restarted Firefox. All anticipation, I clicked over to Amazon, salivating over the wonderful new descriptive information on what types of libraries collect each book, opened a book record, and… nothing. What did I do wrong? None of the records have the promised “Audience Level” indicator. I’m so disappointed. [Update: Jeremy from OCLC research pointed out that the OCLC test server was down that day. Now everything works PERFECTLY. Yippee!!!]

Does anyone have any idea what I have to do other than have the extension and script installed?

6 Comments

Google Takes Over the World… With My Help

I did it. I signed up for Google Spreadsheets, and I just got my acceptance letter.

I don’t know why I feel a little sheepish about adding to the Google mania, but I can’t really justify not playing with something simply because the company comes out with a new product every two or three weeks. I always was a stubborn one, though. If everybody says I have to see a movie, I don’t see the movie… One of my less-admirable traits, I suppose.

Ah well. It’s only a little feeling of sheepishness, easily ignored, easily dismissed. Let the playing begin!

2 Comments