Skip to content

Category: Carleton

What Writing Can Teach Us

This morning was the first of three consecutive mornings that I’ll be spending reading the sophomore writing portfolios at my college. This is my first time reading such things, and I must say that it’s kind of daunting.

You see, each year, all the sophomores turn in three to five examples of their writing from their first two years of college. Each year, some time soon after school gets out, a whole bunch of faculty and some staff (all volunteers) gather to read hundreds and hundreds of portfolios over the course of three mornings. And this year, I’m included in this bunch of readers.

Readers volunteer for a number of reasons. They want to see examples of assignments from other professors. They want to re-calibrate their own grading by reading masses and masses of writing. They want to intervene with students who need help. And the list goes on. It’s really fun to see a bunch of people taking on a task that just has to get done, but rather than just do it they reinvent it as a powerful professional development tool.

I’m there because my college is thinking of coming up with information literacy benchmarks for first- and second-year students. So another librarian and I are helping to read the portfolios not only to help make it through the boxes and boxes of papers, but also to find examples of information literacy at work and see if we can generalize our observations to help us develop an assessment matrix or a first-year info-lit initiative.

So far, after reading only a couple of portfolios, I’ve learned that:

  • underclassmen don’t understand citation, but that they can do it if guided
  • they are happy to use outside sources, but the sources control the writer rather than the other way around
  • that they think of “fact” and “interpretation” as much more distinct categories than they really are
  • and that I’m a very slow portfolio reader (I’ll really have to pick up the pace tomorrow… it’s been a long time since I was a regular writing tutor and could do this in my sleep.)

On a somewhat separate note, I’m quite happy that I can walk into a room full of faculty members and not only greet and be greeted by name, but also carry on conversations with them about everything from libraries to pedagogy to gardening and not feel out of place. I’ve worked hard this past year to build this kind of relationship, and it’s finally feeling less I’m “just staff.” In fact, all the librarians have been working at getting involved in all sorts of things across campus, and now we’re beginning to be invited to meetings as less of an afterthought. Slowly but surely…

(The Pinky and the Brain song comes to mind…) Tee hee hee.

1 Comment

It’s a … CMS! (Isn’t it cute…)

After two years of deliberations, testing, talking, and not a little hair-pulling, my campus has finally decided to adopt Moodle rather than Sakai. This decision, which was made just about 20 minutes ago, is the culmination of weekly meetings for the last 10 weeks. I’ve spent literally hundreds of hours in the last couple of months sifting through surveys, usability studies, and pedagogical issues, and I can say with full sincerity that I’m very pleased with our decision. Sakai has so much potential but is just not as polished as Moodle.

I’m flying pretty high right now. It’s going to be quite a job to keep my concentration going today (yes, I am at work because my college doesn’t take today off), but I’ve got to just grit my teeth and do it. My presentation won’t organize itself…

Comments closed

Do you WeSearch?

For a rich source of research help for data and other sources in the social sciences (economics, political science, education, sociology, anthropology, and more), check out the weserachQuestions blog. And remember, it’s SEARCHABLE.

Comments closed

Strategic Planning 2.0

After our rousing success with the vision statement meeting (posted on here and here), the entire library staff got together to discuss our three-year strategic plan. I’ll admit, I was worried. We’ve had a lot of meetings lately and it’s getting a little old. But we somehow managed to discuss the strategic plan for an hour and a half, make significant process, and not end up hating the process, our co-workers, or the plan itself. (The scones and fruit waiting on the staff-room table helped keep us all focused.) Note that this does NOT mean that I hope we have all-staff meetings every other week! However, if we do have all-staff meetings, they should be like this one and the visioning meeting. They were successful because there was something to do, a plan for getting it done, collective and collaborative work toward doing it, and we stopped the meeting when it was done. These simple rules should apply for all meetings, please!

What do I like so much about this strategic plan? Well, it begins with an introductory statement which grew out of our discussion about the vision statement. We were burning with enthusiasm for the growing role the library will play in collecting, organizing, housing, and aiding in the discovery of not only text but also data, images, media, etc. And we were very excited about providing access to content regardless of format. Unfortunately, this excitement originally eclipsed any mention of text and content. So our Strategic Plan, as it is drafted at the moment, tries to bridge the old and the new in a much more constructive manner. It also includes specific affirmations of experimentation, not for experimentation’s sake, but in response to user need and with the recognition that not everything will work as planned.

Here are some of the specific pieces of the plan that really struck me:

  • Experiment with new approaches to services, technologies, professional development, space, and furnishings to respond to user needs.
  • Experiment with tools and interfaces that move us towards the goal of seamless access to a broad scope of distributed information resources and customizable views of information space.
  • Secure grant funding to experiment with selection, acquisition, organization, and providing access to data, sound and image resources, and other digital content as needed by faculty and students.
  • Widen the campus discussion of the future of scholarly communication and publishing and help develop a better understanding of their implications for the role of libraries.

There are three pages of bullet points… but you get the idea.

Since this meeting, we’ve learned that our strategic plan will have to remain in draft form until next fall (yikes!) when it can be vetted by some departments that are too busy right now to look at it.

Comments closed