Skip to content

Month: March 2011

Teaching poorly

My last two classes of this term were… challenging, and I did a pretty poor job of rising to the challenges. One of them was just a case of me not having my head on very straight, talking more than I intended, and forgetting to mention things I’d meant to emphasize. What’s more, it’s the first time I’ve had a group of students just flatly refused to participate, no matter how much prodding they got from me and their professor, in a group activity that I’ve had several classes do before with good success. But in the end the students all left class with at least one scholarly article and at least one newspaper article for their papers, and most of them hadn’t done the kinds of things we were doing in class before, so it wasn’t useless, but it certainly wasn’t great.

The other class was very different. The professor couldn’t be there and had left me a long list of potentially useful things her students would need to know, but when I got there and asked them where they were with their paper topics, the conversation turned into a long brainstorming session where they helped each other come up with the required material culture artifacts that they’d need to incorporate into their papers. Only one of them needed the kinds of primary sources we have in the library, as it turns out. We did talk a bit about other primary and secondary sources that might be useful to them, and we did talk about how the strategies for finding out about and laying hands on primary sources is often fundamentally different from the strategies for secondary sources, but for the most part it was just the 13 of us thinking about how to illustrate their arguments with things like ear buds, album covers, magazines, and cigarette packs. And then I got up and showed them 10 minutes worth of “And here’s OAIster and the American Periodicals Series and ProQuest Historical Newspapers… just in case you ever need them.” I think they absolutely needed that time to think through their sources, but I also think that there’s very little that I could contribute to that experience.

In the first class, the overarching message was “there’s lots of stuff available,” which is ok, but maybe not the single most helpful message for first year students. In the second class the overarching message was “the library doesn’t have the sources you need” which felt odder. Both are often true, but neither are my favorite messages to convey.

2 Comments

Teaching for my own amusement

Last week I had a lot of fun joining Jason, Anna, and Rachel on Adventures in Library Instruction. I’d had a bit of a rough day, but talking with three people as enthusiastic and interesting as these three really turned things around. They’re awesome!

Since then, I’ve been thinking about part of that conversation where I realized I really only gave half of an answer to a really good question. I was talking about using both Google Scholar and disciplinary databases together (expanding on my post about why undergraduates need those clunky databases anyway) and Rachel asked how I justify teaching some of this stuff when the assignment is really VERY basic: find 3 articles. I think there could be a lot of reasons, some better than others, but I think the main one for me is that I teach for my own amusement.

I don’t mean that I teach things that aren’t useful (well, I probably do, but not on purpose) but that I really think it’s ok to geek out a little in the classroom. That was one of the key things I learned at ACRL Immersion: being authentic is more important than being perfect, and students engage more with people who are engaged. If I’m actually interested in what I’m teaching, the classroom experience has got to be better than if I’m bored. And I am NOT interested in database interfaces. I’m just not. But boy can I ever geek out over citation and the way that it reveals how disciplines construct knowledge, and boy can I get excited about the ways people build up enough knowledge about a topic to do intelligent searches for new information on that topic.

I can’t possibly expect my students to care about something I don’t care about. But I can hope that if I care a lot they’ll at least be interested enough to wonder why I care. And if they’re nodding and smiling and laughing with (ok, maybe at) me, they’re more engaged than if they’re asleep, and maybe at that point I have a hope of pulling them along on the coat-tails of my own enthusiasm into the nitty-gritty of research.

Barring that, at least I won’t have been bored.

—

Adventures in Library Instruction – Episode 23 (MP3)

Posts referenced in the podcast:

Comments closed