Allow me to take a moment to rant a little. There are some common metaphors that are slowly but surely losing their meaning as people get them mixed up or use them to describe an ever broadening set of nouns. These metaphors are transparency and opacity. They are most often used to refer to processes and procedures, though lately I’ve seen them in all kinds of literature and used to describe everything from word definitions to philosophical ideas.
Here’s how they should work. Transparent processes are easy to understand. Opaque processes are not. Think of a box full of gears. If the box is transparent, you can see how the gears move and can therefore anticipate actions, think up changes to the process, and generally know what you’re dealing with. If the box is opaque, you can’t see any gears moving, so you have to guess how things might work.
This is why the metaphors get confusing when used to describe things that are not processes. If you’re talking about a thing (such as an idea), you might think, “If this idea were a physical thing, I’d want to be able to see it to understand it. Therefore I’d think it should be opaque, because you can’t see transparent things. If I can’t see this idea-thing I can’t understand it.” This makes sense but is not how the metaphor works. It just isn’t.
Here’s the rule: the transparency/opacity refers to an imaginary enclosure. If it’s transparent, you can see what’s going on inside the enclosure; if it’s opaque, you can’t. Transparency = understandable. Opacity = mysterious.
my dear Iris,
to whom (or what) do we owe this rant? Curious minds (ok, mine especially) want to know.
Transparently yours,
Oh, it’s been building for about a year. Then, last night, I was chatting with somebody who said, “That idea’s pretty opaque to me, but what I don’t understand is how….” For some reason, that’s what I was thinking about over breakfast this morning.
hehehe
oh, and amen!
i also have serious issue with transparency used to describe a supposedly open bureaucracy. first off, is a bureaucracy a process? probably not. and it’s the rare bureaucracy that could be transparent in the first place. le sigh
for some reason the word opaque always makes the think of tights (the kind one wears on one’s legs).
i wonder what kind of metaphor could come of that?
Love this post, Iris, thank you. :)
Your next assignment is to give us the words to describe *ideas* that we don’t understand–are they impenetrable? abstruse? Or am I just being obtuse?
I think we should put mysterious *ideas* in tights. That would solve all of our problems. ;-)