Skip to content

Category: News

Is "Pod" proprietary?

Apple is mad at a company called Podcast Ready for using the term “pod” in connection with a “portable listening device” (citing the letter sent to Podcast Ready, as reported and displayed by Wired). And this is apparently not the first time in recent history that Apple has tried to lay claim to the word. Apple also claims to have applied for a word mark for “pod,” though this doesn’t appear in the USPTO’s searchable online database.

In all fairness, though, just because I can’t find it doesn’t mean they haven’t applied. What’s more, if they want to be taken seriously by the USPTO, they have to send these letters to people to prove that they’re defending their mark.

I also notice that several other corporations have applied (as recently as yesterday) for the rights to the word “pod.” Just search for “pod” or for the serial number 78964910 to see examples.

Comments closed

Project Gutenberg Update

I don’t know when this happened, but Project Gutenberg (my favorite source for free, full-text-searchable, downloadable e-texts of out-of-copyright books – that’s quite a mouthful) has made its site into a wiki. You have to log in to edit pages, and there are some restrictions on which pages you can edit (here are the rules), but it looks like anyone can create an account. Cool.

2 Comments

GoogleNews Archive Search

Google has unveiled a new service (which they seem to be doing with amazing regularity). Now you can search 200 years of newspaper articles using the Google News Archive. The Search Engine Watch article is here, and Resource Shelf has another article on the new service here. I haven’t had much of a chance to explore this new thing today (having only had 20 minutes at my desk all day, yikes), but here are some preliminary thoughts on the features of this new search:

  • Like Google Scholar, not everything you find will be freely available online. Some libraries are contacting Google to ask about adding their link resolvers to this new service, but I don’t know yet what the answer has been so far.
  • There’s limited faceting available on the left-hand sidebar so that you can limit your search results to a specific time period or a specific publication. Yay!
  • You can elect to have your results returned chronologically by using the “Timeline” button. Cool.
  • There is no list of sources. This is terrible. That means that you’re searching blind, though you can be pretty sure the major papers will be represented. (Resource Shelf points out in their article that searching “Source:[source name]” works.)

Those are the main points that interest me about the features. But when I think of how this new service relates to my life in the library I’m left with mixed feelings. I look forward to having another “back up” search interface. (I often use Google Scholar as a last-ditch search when all normal avenues have failed. And sometimes this less specific searches return what I’ve been looking for. Now I can do the same for news sources, including advertisements, btw.)

But I’m worried that this will be yet another “easy” service that isn’t as powerful as would be useful to my students, but that will seduce them with its familiarity and immediate results. I also wish I didn’t have yet another service to add to the list of places you can search as long as you’re careful not to pay for anything because we offer the same content FOR FREE.

And finally, I’m beginning to worry about Google offering new services so regularly. My first thought when I heard about the archive search was that this new thing was sapping development time from about a million other projects that I consider only half done. The book search isn’t perfect (and isn’t done), blogger is anything but done, Google Calendar doesn’t do everything it could or should, and the list goes on. I wish they’d spend some time completing a few of their other useful services rather than pushing out something new every month. But that’s just me. I could never operate if I just kept adding projects to my cue rather than finishing a few here and there.

Of course, these niggling worries didn’t stop me from checking the new service out in between editing a Writely document, blogging, adding appointments to my Google Calendar, and generally relying heavily on all things Google.

2 Comments

The First Public Internet Library

It’s not news anymore. It’s been blogged to death. But I just wanted to point out that OCLC’s free, public search interface is now available to all. This interface is still a baby interface with lots of upgrades planned in the next months, but once you’ve done a search you can see most of the things we’ve been calling for in catalogs, including faceted search (in the form of “Refine Your Search” on the right sidebar), FRBRized records (click on “editions” when you’ve clicked into a book’s record), user reviews, and more. You can also get a browser search box if you want, or embed a search box into a web site (hmmmm, so many ideas bouncing around in my head).

I’m intrigued by the note in the “help” screen that says that when you search from within a library-authenticated internet connection you may get a link to that library’s “As a Librarian” service. How do we get this added for my library? I don’t know. But it’s something we should think about doing.

2 Comments