Skip to content

Author: Iris

Anatomy of a Mass Internet Argument (aka “Blog Drama”)

Published by Iris on Wednesday, April 13th, 2011

Every so often, people in online communities turn their attention toward one thing and argue heatedly. Here’s how it generally goes.

  1. Initial controversial statement (This is usually something that can be interpreted as “You and everything you value? It all sucks.”)
  2. Initial “Hey, who do you think you are anyway? And by the way, you suck” response.
  3. Mass internet pile on
  4. Later, in no particular order
    • Sporadic “That controversial statement wasn’t controversial. It’s been said/done/thought since the beginning of time” interjections
    • Sporadic “That initial statement was spot on” interjections (mostly ignored or decried)
    • Summary blog posts for newcomers to the argument
    • Meta blog posts talking about the experience of the argument (ahem, You Are Here)
  5. Argument is named something catchy (usually a catchy acronym or some reference to Watergate)
  6. People wax nostalgic about the argument, getting all heated up about it in short bursts
  7. Argument becomes point of comparison in the next mass internet argument
8 Comments

Strength in Interdependence

Published by Iris on Friday, April 8th, 2011

I had a great conference at ACRL 2011. And as normally happens to me at a conference, this conference developed a theme organically for me as pieces and parts of different sessions stood out and grabbed my attention — a bright shining thread spun itself out of the various sessions and strung itself through the conversations and presentations and plans. What wasn’t so normal for me about this organic theme is that it aligned with the conference’s publicly stated slogan: A Declaration of Interdependence. I normally pay little attention to slogans, so I admit being a little peeved when I had a moment of insight and then realized that ACRL had predicted it. I felt kind of like I had invented the solution to 2+2 and then been told, “Yeah, that was the point of arithmetic, silly.” But regardless, there was that shining thread materializing in front of me: interdependence is the key — it might solve everything.

Here’s how I arrived there in three chronological steps.

  1. I attended a session about developing collaborations with campus faculty, and the whole session revolved around this sense that faculty were somehow a problem to be solved. The conversation revolved around librarians feeling misunderstood and begging for recognition as professionals. It did not, however, tell me much about collaborative relationships. It left me feeling a little sad.
  2. Then I went to a session about developing our own communities of practice (presented by my new librarian crush, Char Booth). This conversation encouraged us to foster and revel in our communities of practice, appreciating them for what they are and constantly honing our practice. And this session said a whole lot about vibrant and collaborative relationships, their power, and how each piece of the collaboration strengthens the whole and strengthens the individual.
  3. Then came the Raj Patel keynote about the vast interdependent networks of variables that determine how things work in our world — farming, household labor, environment, policy, production, and culture all contribute to the price of a hamburger, for example. He pointed out that the Tea Party (no, not that Tea Party, the original one) hadn’t been about overthrowing the East India Company, but about “negotiating interdependence from a position of power” (a phrase I just love). No one thing works by itself, and things working together in a system are strong as a system specifically because the parts are different but working together.

And so there I was, inventing 2+2, and realizing that our systemic insecurity about our roles on our campuses and even amongst our colleagues could be one of the things that’s preventing us from really participating in this ecosystem as fully as we might. We could be just as guilty as anyone else of not appreciating the role we do or could play in that interdependent environment, so we’re trying to say “We’re like you trees in all these important ways, so value us” when in fact the trees depend on us birds to distribute their seeds and we depend on their fruit and their branches. We’re not negotiating our interdependence from a position of power, and so we’re dependent (resonance with the Big Deal, anyone?). Strength, freedom, and self-assurance lie in interdependence.

3 Comments

Dear Blog

Published by Iris on Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

Dear Blog,

On this, your 5th birthday, I’d like to thank you for introducing me to some of the people who are now my best friends in the world, for never backfiring on me too badly when I stuck my toes in the crazy, for never attracting the real crazy that exists out there on the internet, for helping me learn to be a librarian, and for helping me learn to be an adult. I started you on a whim and on another platform. I’ve fallen out of love with you and then realized that it wasn’t you, it was me, and this realization led me back to appreciating you again. And through it all, you’re still here, bursting with drafts that I may never flesh out, but here nonetheless. Happy birthday.

Yours,
Iris

2 Comments

Statistical Abstract of the United States on the Chopping Block

Published by Iris on Friday, March 18th, 2011

I kept waiting until I had something really substantive to say about this, but my brain has been on the fritz lately so I’ll settle with a purely factual post for those who haven’t yet heard.

About 10 days ago, rumors started flying that the Census Bureau was going to discontinue the Statistical Abstract because of budget cuts. A few days ago, these rumors became more concrete when a member of GovDoc-L called Ian O’Brien, Chief of the Statistical Compendia Branch, and heard that yes, the entire Compendia Branch will be unfunded next year. This means that after more than 130 years of publication, next year there will be no Statistical Abstract (online or in print), and no other titles produced by that branch, either (including the State and Metropolitan Area Data Book and the County and City Data Book. (Here’s the full GovDoc-L post.)

I guess Congress feels that there’s no need to synthesize this information for the public now that the more raw data is out there for messing with. I completely disagree, since usually there’s very little way to tell which group might have collected the data into which dataset until you look at the source notes in the Statistical Abstract.

Several libraries (including mine) are planning to write letters to congress about this. Haley Mooney posted her version for people to use as a starting point for their letters, and I’ll repost it here.

Dear ____,

The U.S. Census Bureau’s Budget Estimates for Fiscal Year 2012 calls for the termination of the Statistical Abstract program.  The library community is deeply upset at the thought of losing access to this important program and urges you to take action to stop this program change.

The Statistical Abstract of the United States is a crucial source in the provision of social, economic, and political indicators to the American public.  The Budget Estimates document suggests that the Statistical Abstract is no longer needed due to the “availability elsewhere of much of the information in the statistical abstract”.  As a reference publication the Statistical Abstract is valued precisely for aggregating in one convenient location a variety of information sources available elsewhere.

The provision of private information not freely available elsewhere is also invaluable.  Published since 1878, this important resource is a staple of reference librarians for its ease of use, comprehensive content, and as a guidebook to statistical sources.

It would be a disservice to the American public to terminate the Statistical Abstract program.  A democratic society is only made possible by an informed citizenry.  The multitude of government statistical programs and publications can be difficult for many members of the public to understand and use.  The government must support programs like the Statistical Abstract that enhance the availability of information.

Many developed countries throughout the world publish Statistical Abstracts.

It is a standard government publication that is universally popular as a tool to understand the state of a nation’s social, political and economic functioning.  Terminating the Statistical Abstract program would lower the United States international standing as free and open society that values unfettered access to information.

Even in these trying economic times the Census Bureau must continue to support the mission of the Department of Commerce to “Improve understanding of the US economy, society and environment by providing timely, relevant, trusted and accurate data, standards and services enabling entities to make informed decisions.”  The Statistical Abstract program clearly supports this goal by providing a valuable directory to the wealth of statistical information produced by the US government and private sources.  We must not let short-sighted and ineffective attempts at lowering the federal deficit stand in the way of upholding the values upon which our nation was founded: a democratic society supported by an informed public.

[Signature]

—-

UPDATE: The ALA Washington Office has issued an action alert with information about whom to contact and what key points would be most valuable for those people to hear from us. I’ll reproduce it here:

Contact appropriators and tell them to oppose the defunding of the Statistical Compendia Branch!

In the coming weeks both the Senate and the House Appropriations committees will be working on the FY2012 budget.  Please take the time to inform them about the importance of the Statistical Compendia Branch’s work.

When President Obama released his 2012 Budget Request to Congress, he included the U.S. Census Bureau’s Budget Estimates, which called for the termination of their Statistical Compendia Branch.

This branch compiles and releases such reports as the Statistical Abstract and the National Data Book that include usable data for the American public.  As the Bureau’s own Budget Estimate states, “the abstract provides a comprehensive summary of industrial, social, economic, and political data…of almost 300 government, private, and international agencies”.

Message to Congress:

  • Continue funding for the Statistical Compendia Branch
  • The Statistical Compendia Branch compiles and releases important reports such as the Statistical Abstract that provide understandable data to a wide swath of the American public.
  • This material is used by librarians, educators, students, private businesses, state and local government officials, etc.
There is no other existing location where this data can be found in a similar usable format.
10 Comments