Feeding the Free Web

As more and more rich, wonderful, authoritative sources go up on the free web, the trick becomes finding it, organizing it, and making it available. And I’m sorry, but I’m not going to bug our catalogers every time I run across a great site online, no matter how accommodating they are whenever I’ve decided to go that route. But handing them anywhere from 5 to 50 links per week would be a prohibitive pain in the neck, even if formal classification in the catalog would provide the best access, or even if we could be sure that the URLs would be stable. I just wouldn’t do it. I’d spend more time than I have to spare agonizing over whether or not it was “worth it” for each site, and in the end they’d just pile up and become one of the looming projects that I always know I should be getting to but never seem to actually do.

So I’ve been trying to keep track of these things in my del.icio.us library, and now that I’ve got a mini curricular and professional library building up, I’ve started feeding the annotated links to web pages attached to my research guides.

So far I only have two up and running. One is on my subject guide for Art and Art History here, which encourages students to see recent items here, or just play around on my del.icio.us library for themselves.

It’s not a perfect solution, and I’m still having trouble standardizing my tagging practices… And I’m not sure if students will ever actually USE the links. But in my imaginary world they’ve all (even the pre-majors) flocked to the newly updated pages and are gazing in wonder at the amazing-ness that is an RSS-fed page of annotated links.

Hey, a girl can dream.

Being on the Other Side of Chat Reference

Yesterday I was asked if I could help someone find the first known translation of a Russian short story (from the early 17th century) into German. In no time flat I’d found a bibliography and was composing my email response when I realized she’d asked for first translation into German… not English, and no bibliographies we have would record such a date.

Scrapping that email I wrote another one about using WorldCat to find bibliographies of this author’s works, and then limiting the language to German, because a German bibliography might just record the date she needed. (I don’t think she quite understood my response, though, but that’s another story.)

Anyway, then one of my co-workers pointed out that the University of Illinois has a whole library devoted to modern languages, and they might have such a bibliography. And sure enough, their catalog returned a record for something that looked promising, if only I could read the German. But I didn’t really want to ILL the enter book on the off chance that it contained the date I needed, so I hopped onto their As A Librarian page and, on a whim, chose the chat option. I’ve never been on this end of chat reference, so I was curious to see it in action.

I explained who I was and what I needed, and the librarian was very friendly and helpful, but in the end had me email my request so that she could give it to someone with an actual command of the languages in question.

This more specialized librarian found what I needed in a Russian-language bibliography, even scanning the page from the bibliography (which I still can’t read) so that my patron could see all the information.

What helpful people! And I’ve got to say, I really enjoyed starting out my quest via chat so that I could clarify myself when the librarian didn’t understand what I needed without having to play email tag. By the time I composed the email I was much more confident that I’d be able to write a question that the librarian on the other end would understand.

I’ve always been hesitant to ask for help from people I don’t know. Before library school I had never in my life asked a librarian for help. But every time I have an interaction like this a little more of that old hesitancy dies. World, beware.

I Knew It!

Remember last year when I wondered what letter would become popular next? Remember I said it would be “s” for “social?” Looks like there’s a possibility I was right. John Blyberg is working on the SOPAC — the social -er- catalog. And man, oh man, does it look good. And you don’t even have to be a library card holder to participate!

But that’s not even the good part. No, the good part is that he’s made his code public.

So let me be among the first to say, “Me too! Me too! I like this idea too!”

[Update: As I suspected, this is getting major buzz in the biblioblogosphere, so I've created two ways to keep up with it. You can see (and subscribe to) the posts I've read on the topic here. And you can see (and subscribe to) a libworm search for the topic here.]

Collaboration, Social Software, and My Strange Obsession With My Virtual Life

I didn’t even get to turn on my computer until 3:00 today. Thank goodness I have pretty much permanent access to a laptop at work because I’ve been living off that today. (Heaven forbid I go for more than a few minutes without a softly glowing screen in front of me.) But in among reference desk shifts and meetings, I was asked to take stock of the collaborative technologies I use.

Here’s the backstory. Back in August people from the library and IT met to discuss collaboration: what we’d done together, what we’re planning to do, and how to enhance collaboration. You may remember that meeting from this post. Out of that meeting grew a new group on campus called the Info Services Forum. This group coordinates periodic (about twice-monthly) sessions at which staff (or interested faculty) can either present or discuss a topic of general interest. Anyone on campus is invited, and there’s free lunch to the first 40 or 50 who show up.

So far we’ve had a session on the planned reorganization of the campus web site (complete with discussions of usability and organization, as well as breakout focus groups on specific organizational ideas). Then there was a session on the new campus copyright policy at which Dan Donnelly from the University of Minnesota’s Copyright Information and Education group gave a really wonderful talk copyright for educational campuses.

Now we’ve had the first of two sessions dealing with collaborative tools, and for the second session they want to put up a slide listing what people here are using already. Here’s my list.

  • del.icio.us (for my own professional work, collaborating/sharing with my co-workers and other librarians, and building a curricular link library for students)
  • Google Docs & Spreadsheets
  • AIM/Google Talk/MSN Messenger/Meebo
  • Blogs (several, some for workplace collaboration, others to communicate with the outside world — a couple are Carleton-supported and a couple aren’t)
  • Shared Google Calendar
  • Moodle
  • Backpack (for shared To Do lists)
  • Bloglines (to share what I’ve found with others (most of my feeds are public), or to learn what others have found, as well as to keep up with my professional and personal blog/journal feeds. I can also keep up with things like updates to wikis or public google docs using RSS.)
  • Flickr
  • LibraryThing (share books, reviews, etc.)
  • I’ve also experimented with Wet Paint (a wiki) as a place to build a curricular resource wiki, though I haven’t had time to work on it for a while.

So, there you have it. Except for the wiki, these are things that I use at least weekly, and often multiple times per day. But just because the first thing I do in the morning is turn my computer on and the last thing I do at night is turn the computer off doesn’t mean anything. I could quit any time…

LibraryThinged

Because I’m a nerd, I spent much of my holiday weekend listening to NPR and cataloging my books in LibraryThing. Here’s what I wrote about my collection:

I’ve always been a heavy library user, so the books that I keep at home tend to fall into three categories: things I read in college and grad school, things I’ve read on planes or vacation, or things I can’t get at my local libraries. I also have a small collection of juvenile fiction that I read when I was young and thought might go out of print and get deselected from libraries. I probably won’t be very disciplined about including library books that I borrow in this collection.

I can’t figure out if I’m glad or sorry that I started this project after weeding my collection down to half or a third of what it used to be. I’m pretty sure I’m glad, though, because working on my laptop (without a convenient number pad) typing in all those ISBNs is a pain. I also discovered that I have a LOT of books that don’t have ISBNs. Those are a major pain to find and enter. I spent the longest time searching for a record for my 1930 edition of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.

I’d put off even looking at LibraryThing until last month mostly because it sounded like just the sort of thing I’d get addicted to and spend way too much time doing. But finally the call of another mode for sharing and organizing stuff became too strong for me and I caved.

Still, even though I had a lot of fun and can see this becoming as much a part of my life as my Flickr and del.icio.us have become, there are a couple of things I’d like to be able to do but can’t. I’m still not sure if I can’t because there is no way, or because I haven’t figured out the way, but here goes.

What I wish I could do (or may be able to do but can’t figure out how):

  • Sort by multiple fields at the same time
  • See who has added me to their watch list, or who other people are watching (a la del.icio.us networking or Flickr contacts)
  • Click on tags other people have given to my book, or selections from my own tags, in order to tag my books. (I hated going back after a couple of days and finding that I’d been hyphenating some works at one point and not later one.)
  • Batch editing/merging of tags.
  • Public/Private comments
  • Fields for translators/illustrators
  • “Advanced search” of multiple fields (like title, author, date, and publisher) to cover those times when you run into a whole shelf of books with no ISBNs.

I’ve found a couple of familiar people out there and added them to my watch list, but only a very, very few. Anybody out there who wants to share your LibraryThing name?