Anatomy of a Mass Internet Argument (aka “Blog Drama”)

Every so often, people in online communities turn their attention toward one thing and argue heatedly. Here’s how it generally goes.

  1. Initial controversial statement (This is usually something that can be interpreted as “You and everything you value? It all sucks.”)
  2. Initial “Hey, who do you think you are anyway? And by the way, you suck” response.
  3. Mass internet pile on
  4. Later, in no particular order
    • Sporadic “That controversial statement wasn’t controversial. It’s been said/done/thought since the beginning of time” interjections
    • Sporadic “That initial statement was spot on” interjections (mostly ignored or decried)
    • Summary blog posts for newcomers to the argument
    • Meta blog posts talking about the experience of the argument (ahem, You Are Here)
  5. Argument is named something catchy (usually a catchy acronym or some reference to Watergate)
  6. People wax nostalgic about the argument, getting all heated up about it in short bursts
  7. Argument becomes point of comparison in the next mass internet argument

8 thoughts on “Anatomy of a Mass Internet Argument (aka “Blog Drama”)

  1. Aw, sometimes the games are kind of fun, even if they are a little distasteful.

    And I hate to break it to you, but over on friendfeed there are two more classic moves being nominated for addition: “I haven’t been paying any attention to/participating in all that stuff” and “I may agree with what you are saying, but I am appalled at the low tone of this discourse among so-called professionals.” I’m afraid you’ve just participated by not participating. You can’t escape! ;-)

  2. Oh yea, FF is pretty much becoming the place for me to stay away from these days. Already have enough things to worry about without the drama. Then again, having an insult or two slung your way because you refuse to go in the mud with the rest certainly does not help (don’t ask. You are better off not knowing).

    Best, and keep on blogging.

  3. A coworker of mine just referenced your post on facebook and I was like, wait a minute, this is Iris’s blog! Tiny world. #3 and the last point of #4 are hilarious

  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:03 pm lris
    Now taking nominations for a catchy name.
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:04 pm Steele Lawman
    PhD: Phear & Doubt. (That's terrible)
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:05 pm lris
    Oh look! Steven Bell did a twofer: "This has been happening for a long time" plus "This is like Gormangate" :-D http://acrlog.org/2011/04/13/why-all-the-fuss-over-phd-academic-librarians/
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:05 pm Pete #TeamMonique
    Trzeciak Attack! PhDemonium. The Hate at Penn State
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:06 pm Steele Lawman
    I figured you'd seen the ACRLog post prior to writing this one.
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:06 pm lris
    I PREDICTED I'D SEE IT
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:07 pm Pete #TeamMonique
    McMasters of the Fumiverse
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:08 pm lris
    Oh, I left out my own classic move: "I haven't been paying any attention to/participating in all that stuff."
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:12 pm Steele Lawman
    We Hate You More Than You Hate Us
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:15 pm Steele Lawman
    Trzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:15 pm Pete #TeamMonique
    The FUD, the mad and the ugly
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:17 pm Steele Lawman
    Oh, another common reaction would be "I may agree with what you are saying, but I am appalled at the low tone of this discourse among so-called professionals."
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:18 pm Pete #TeamMonique
    Kiss My Crystal Balls
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:27 pm lris
    I think I'll have to update the post later with that wonderful addition. :-)
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:28 pm Pete #TeamMonique
    I like to think I am part of the lower tone ;)
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:30 pm Andy
    "Hire Education"
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:34 pm Catherine Pellegrino
    Wait, but I thought blogs were dead? Why are we even still having this argument? ;)
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 2:37 pm John Dupuis
    Relevant article today in IHE on alternative career paths for PhDs. And no, libraries aren't mentioned: http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2011/04/13/essay_on_what_professors_should_tell_their_grad_students
  • Wednesday, April 13th, 2011 at 6:03 pm Mark Kille
    I am amused by Steven Bell's ACRL post, because when we were discussing sausagefest dynamics yesterday, his name immediately jumped to my mind, but I didn't want to unfairly impute a position to him. Turns out I was pretty much right.
  • Thursday, April 14th, 2011 at 8:38 pm Hedgehog
    I can't stop laughing about this!!!
  • Thursday, April 14th, 2011 at 8:59 pm Steele Lawman
    We have almost hit the next stage, that being "That controversy is so last week! We are on to the new crazy thing!
  • Thursday, April 14th, 2011 at 9:16 pm Walt Crawford
    Steve: That last line hits a little close to home, albeit for a different Mass Internet Argument...
  • Thursday, April 14th, 2011 at 9:37 pm Steele Lawman
    That is so last week that I don't even know what you are talking about.
  • Thursday, April 14th, 2011 at 9:45 pm Andy
    Are we still talking about this? I'm like 3 blog posts past this. :P

Comments are closed.