Whither Blogging?

I haven’t written as much here in the last two years as I did in the years before that. Part of that is because most of the conversation happens on FriendFeed these days, part of that is because I’ve been sick the whole time. I have all kinds of post stubs in my drafts that I just didn’t have the energy to flesh out into real posts with, you know, full sentences and maybe a paragraph break.

In that time many of my favorite blogs have petered out, a few have blown up, and a couple people whose opinions I respect a lot have told me that blogging just isn’t worth it any more, that they kind of wish people wouldn’t keep throwing posts into the void. And for a while I was inclined to agree and acknowledge that it’s perfectly likely that people see Pegasus Librarian pop up in their aggregators or on FriendFeed and think “Aw man, her again? Doesn’t she know she’s boring? *mark as read*”

But lately I’ve felt more and more like posting mundane little things here again, and maybe soon I’ll start working through a few of the more promising post stubs from the dark period of the last two years. For me, worrying about the death of blogging and worrying about whether anyone cared that I post here seems to have been more tied to my feelings about other things in my personal life than it was to the actual act of posting here. For me, realizing that I care again that I own and archive my thoughts, that I’m ok with this not being a conversation space if conversation doesn’t happen, and that it matters more that I have a thinky space for me than that I have one for anyone else — these things are all making me feel less like I’m clinging to nostalgia or that I’m in denial whenever I post. When FriendFeed dies, I still want to have access to some of my thoughts.

Of course, I say this just as Fall Term is about to start, so there’s no telling when I’ll have time to write much. But you never know.

8 thoughts on “Whither Blogging?

  1. Readers are wonderful, conversation is amazing, and I’m always up for more of it in blog terms. Fundamentally, though, I blog for me.

    Sometimes I’m working out how to articulate things to other people: simply writing notes to myself doesn’t do it (I know what I mean!) but writing for even a very theoretical audience in a public or semi-public space forces me to look closely at what I’m trying to share and how I’m doing it. That’s always good practice, and it benefits so many areas of my life when I do it regularly, whatever the topic.

    Sometimes, I’m writing stuff that will be useful later. And I’ve written posts in other settings where the initial post got no interest – but six months, or a few years later, it’s suddenly exactly the right thing for someone when they find it through a search. That’s pretty cool.

    And right now, I admit, I’m also blogging to demonstrate some of how I do this librarian thing, for people who might want to hire me. (Interestingly, it’s also making it easier for me to find a consistent voice/tone while blogging than I had been, which makes me happy.)

    I’m often lousy at commenting on blogs, but I’ve enjoyed yours since I found it, and I would love to read more, when and if you’ve got the momentum. How can a thoughtful person sharing interesting stuff be a bad thing? It’s not like we have a shortage of Internet. People can read it or not, as they choose.

  2. That’s kind of you to say, Jen. Like you, I’m terrible at commenting on blogs for no good reason, so I’m grateful you commented on mine today. :-)

    I’m not quite sure what’s going to become of this space, but for the first time in a long time I’m sure it’ll be something. At least for the next foreseeable while.

  3. I can tell you that, of all the blogs I read (and I read quite a few still), there are only maybe 3-5 where I read everything the bloggers write and get really excited when I see that they’ve posted. Yours is one of those 3-5. I know I’m only one person, but I’ve actually missed your musings on academic librarianship and technology and small slices of your life as a librarian. I love that I can see you actually working out your own thoughts on an idea within the content of your post (I do that too!).

    I know that since having my son it’s become more difficult to find time to post, and I’ve gone through those dark times when I didn’t really see the point of blogging or feel inspired enough to do it. But I love having a space where I can work out my ideas, share interesting anecdotes and feel like I’m contributing to the professional conversation. And I don’t care if people say that blogging is dead — I loved blogging when I had four people reading my blog, I love it now when thousands of people read it, and I’ll love it when everyone stops reading what I write. Because many of the reason why I do it have nothing to do with my audience — I also blog for me.

    I’m just glad to see you working out your thoughts on this issue on the blog rather than closing up shop like Steve did. I’d hate to lose all of my favorite bloggers!!!

  4. Ditto on the previous comments! I actually have a little file for “great ideas from Iris” and posts from this blog that have particularly resonated with me. So count me in as an appreciative reader.

  5. Although I don’t have my own private blog, I have recently started up Yammer for our organisation and for our library. I think the motivation and the ability to sustain it has come from over the years reading other blogs and getting ideas and inspirations from these blogs. Coming from Australia, and working in law libraries, we have very few bloggers so we tend to seek inspiration outside of Australia. I think to start blogging is a brave initial step, you have put your ideas out there and to continue it has been a great professional step, it has shaped your thoughts and got others thinking. Thankyou for your blog, I am always interested to hear your experiences with students, as I am also a trainer of law clerks and law grads so i often try out some of your ideas to engage them. I am very grateful that you share your way of doing things. I look forward to more of it!!

  6. Thanks Cindy. That’s very nice of you to say.

    It’s funny because I often look to Australian librarians for inspiration. Seems like many of the interesting ideas I’ve heard about for the last few years have come from Down Under. :-)

  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 4:01 pm Walt Crawford
    I like it, but I'm mystified by people who "kind of wish people wouldn’t keep throwing posts into the void"--I always wonder why people feel *other people* should stop doing things they find worthwhile.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 4:03 pm Dan: Bibrarian
    I agree, Walt. If they don't want to read my drivel, there's plenty more out there on the Net to keep anyone entertained, educated, and informed. In the end, would they rather me throw posts into the void or apply them to a wall using Krylon? :)
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 4:08 pm lris
    That's easy to say and believe in theory, but I think the sentiment was more complicated than I could really make it late at night (I set it to auto post thinking I'd have time to tinker this morning... oh well). For me, when I've had the thought that I kind of wish people would just give up, it was more because I couldn't see the value in what I was producing, but that I first experienced that thought as frustration with what (a few) other people were doing. Only later did I realize it was at least as much about me. And now I don't care about the "value" of what I'm producing as much. Progress? Who knows.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 4:24 pm Walt Crawford
    I certainly agree that there are times when it pays to set aside "value" questions. If I only did things that I was sure had lasting and significant value...well, that would leave a lot of time for daytime TV and other truly valuable activities.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 4:33 pm David Rothman (☤)
    I would blog if I still had the time and energy. :(
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 4:56 pm Joe Boone
    "Marked at Read." Really, I read and enjoyed the post. Eventually the term "blogging" will go away, and publishing will take its place. That is simply it. Publish what you want to publish, and the people who like to read what you have to say will find it and like it.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 5:02 pm Hedgehog
    I agree with your thought that sometimes we need our personal space to think. Isn't that why a lot of us started blogs in the first place? We had something to say and wanted somewhere of our own to say it? I've argued with myself on continuing to blog because I don't have a huge audience, am not ridiculously prolific, haven't started too many wars. But it's my space and I get to see what I've written, ideas I've had and where I'm going. And if it helps other people think about things too...that's not a bad thing.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 5:09 pm Walt Crawford
    I doubt "blogging" will go away, at least not for a long time. There are many forms of publishing, and most of them have their own names--journals, magazines, articles, short stories, novellas, books, flyers, newspapers, blogs, lifestreams (ugh), what have you. As with books, the uses of blogs change as other media (e.g. "microblogging," upgraded from ugh to meh) add other choices.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 5:15 pm Nikki D.
    Personal space to think is why I continue mine although I don't hold myself to any particular topics, audience, length of entries (diminishing with life/job duties) or number of updates (except Fridays). If I have something to say, I write. If someone else finds it interesting, great. I've never thought I Must Contribute Great Things To The Library Field Through Blogging because I know I don't. I don't know what my mindset is for much of anything else either but that rarely stops me ;)
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 5:27 pm Steele Lawman
    I'm one of those people who sometimes "kind of wish[es] people wouldn’t keep throwing posts into the void," so let me see if I can de-mystify that point of view. It's similar to the thought that perhaps a certain band should have quit before their music got repetitive and predictable, or that a certain sports hero should have stayed retired the first time. It's how I feel when I see that someone has posted something and I remember how I used to feel excited about it and now I feel dutiful or annoyed. It's a worry that what I have written seems as boring and repetitive and what I am reading. It's a sense that I'd rather people followed Walt's First Law more diligently. It's a feeling that is not entirely rational and not entirely flattering to admit, and it says more about me than it does about the people who are still blogging.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 5:55 pm John Dupuis
    I think it's interesting that the proliferation of strong blogging communities has really been very positive for science blogging. It's lead to some really exciting times and lots of attention to the networks and the bloggers. The downside, of course, is that probably at least some independent bloggers feel left out and wondering how they can attract traffic.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 5:56 pm lris
    I think approaching blogging as if it were a band or a sport is part of what I'm trying to get away from. The blogs I've loved are the ones that give me insight into the thoughts of people I like and respect. It's the people that matter to me more than the performance. I don't get tired of hearing friends talk about what they're contemplating the way I get tired of same-old-same-old from a band.
  • Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 6:05 pm Walt Crawford
    I'm with Iris and Nikki here--and I see what Steve's saying. I really, truly, wholly dislike the whole "blogging is ALWAYS AND ENTIRELY about Building Your Brand" notion, and all the "you must post x items per day, but hey, you can buy ideas" crap that goes with it. I think liblogs are mostly out of that nonsense. Mostly.

Comments are closed.