<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Close Reading Data Visualizations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2010/03/close-reading-data-visualizations.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2010/03/close-reading-data-visualizations.html</link>
	<description>Learning in Libraries and Loving It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2010/03/close-reading-data-visualizations.html/comment-page-1#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasuslibrarian.com/?p=1340#comment-2806</guid>
		<description>Oh, excellent points!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, excellent points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2010/03/close-reading-data-visualizations.html/comment-page-1#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasuslibrarian.com/?p=1340#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>My challenge with that graphic was related to the gender icons. (And not the gender-binary aspect of the blue/pink characters, although that chapped my hide as well.) What I mean is that you have a column that is 4 figures wide by some number of figures tall. The &quot;boy&quot; figures were always on the bottom, so you could easily judge boy figures against boy figures without even paying attention to the &quot;girl&quot; figures. To be able to visualize the girl figures against the girl figures, you&#039;ve got to drill down one more level. I wish it was possible to transpose the boy/girl figures on those graphs, which would allow you to easily compare girls v. girls or boys v. boys, all while still visualizing the ratio between girls and boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My challenge with that graphic was related to the gender icons. (And not the gender-binary aspect of the blue/pink characters, although that chapped my hide as well.) What I mean is that you have a column that is 4 figures wide by some number of figures tall. The &#8220;boy&#8221; figures were always on the bottom, so you could easily judge boy figures against boy figures without even paying attention to the &#8220;girl&#8221; figures. To be able to visualize the girl figures against the girl figures, you&#8217;ve got to drill down one more level. I wish it was possible to transpose the boy/girl figures on those graphs, which would allow you to easily compare girls v. girls or boys v. boys, all while still visualizing the ratio between girls and boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

