<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Research Guides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides.html</link>
	<description>Learning in Libraries and Loving It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristofer</title>
		<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides.html/comment-page-1#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Responding to your points&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1)Yeah, it is not as easy as one would think. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2) Research Guides are one of the few things we DO NOT standardized and most of us do not even use the cms templates to create them.   We let the liaisons decide what is needed for their areas, though I do understand the desire to have some standardization, especially for our undergrad classes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3)Always takes time to experiment, which it always seems we have not enough time for. It took me several months to come up with a wiki I liked using and a format that made sense.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;your summation) &lt;br/&gt;Well, I wouldn’t necessarily say I am right, as it is just what I have done this year.  Of course, next year I am sure things will either “look off” or “just wrong” and I will rethink it all over again. :) Cheers!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kristofer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to your points</p>
<p>1)Yeah, it is not as easy as one would think. </p>
<p>2) Research Guides are one of the few things we DO NOT standardized and most of us do not even use the cms templates to create them.   We let the liaisons decide what is needed for their areas, though I do understand the desire to have some standardization, especially for our undergrad classes.</p>
<p>3)Always takes time to experiment, which it always seems we have not enough time for. It took me several months to come up with a wiki I liked using and a format that made sense.</p>
<p>your summation) <br />Well, I wouldn’t necessarily say I am right, as it is just what I have done this year.  Of course, next year I am sure things will either “look off” or “just wrong” and I will rethink it all over again. :) Cheers!</p>
<p>Kristofer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides.html/comment-page-1#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Hi Kristofer,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, a more dynamic medium would probably solve a lot of my problems.  I&#039;ve experimented with going the wiki route, and I probably will again.  The three things that have stopped me so far are not really the fault of the wiki environment.  They are:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1) Lack of time to convert everything.  (Though once the first conversion was done, it would probably save me time in the long run.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2) The whole department isn&#039;t on board with moving in that directly, and I do believe that there&#039;s value in having consistent access to our guides for all our students. This is especially true, I think, at a school like ours where all the students take so many classes outside of their majors.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3) I haven&#039;t come up with an organizational structure in the wiki environment that makes sense to me.  But again, this is probably due to lack of time to experiment with it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;4) The web designers have been toying with the idea of creating a library-specific application that would be wiki-like, but even more perfectly designed for what we need.  But as long as we hold out hope that they&#039;re developing that, which they haven&#039;t yet begun, we aren&#039;t experimenting with other tools, which is probably not wise.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So all this is to say, &quot;good idea,&quot; and &quot;you&#039;re probably right.&quot;  And thank you very much for showing me your wiki examples!  I always learn a lot when I see what has worked for other librarians.  Little by little, I might teach myself how this could work for me and my department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kristofer,</p>
<p>Yes, a more dynamic medium would probably solve a lot of my problems.  I&#8217;ve experimented with going the wiki route, and I probably will again.  The three things that have stopped me so far are not really the fault of the wiki environment.  They are:</p>
<p>1) Lack of time to convert everything.  (Though once the first conversion was done, it would probably save me time in the long run.)</p>
<p>2) The whole department isn&#8217;t on board with moving in that directly, and I do believe that there&#8217;s value in having consistent access to our guides for all our students. This is especially true, I think, at a school like ours where all the students take so many classes outside of their majors.</p>
<p>3) I haven&#8217;t come up with an organizational structure in the wiki environment that makes sense to me.  But again, this is probably due to lack of time to experiment with it.</p>
<p>4) The web designers have been toying with the idea of creating a library-specific application that would be wiki-like, but even more perfectly designed for what we need.  But as long as we hold out hope that they&#8217;re developing that, which they haven&#8217;t yet begun, we aren&#8217;t experimenting with other tools, which is probably not wise.</p>
<p>So all this is to say, &#8220;good idea,&#8221; and &#8220;you&#8217;re probably right.&#8221;  And thank you very much for showing me your wiki examples!  I always learn a lot when I see what has worked for other librarians.  Little by little, I might teach myself how this could work for me and my department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristofer</title>
		<link>http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides.html/comment-page-1#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pegasuslibrarian.com/2007/08/online-research-guides/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Iris: when I started several years ago, I had one general Research Guide for my department…..Graduate Education. Our Grad Ed program has many facets, such as ESL, MAED, EdD, Masters in Teaching, and Environmental Education.  As you can imagine, the Environmental Education students are going to be needing something a bit different from our ESL people, so I have been over the last few years, designing Research Guides for each general area.  I am also starting to move these into a wiki format. Now, the guides I do have usually have an index to their specific resource needs: reference, web, articles, books, etc…I have also started to think of them as “one stop shopping” for the students.  If they were/are going to bookmark one page from the library, I would like it to be the research guide.  I have also started, with the wiki, to start off with a question, such as “Looking for Articles?” “Where are the databases?” “How do get books from other libraries?”, etc…as opposed to just a heading with a list of resources to follow. I  think part of the reason for doing that, is that some people might not understand a heading like “databases” or “interlibrary loan”.  Anyway, here is one of them that I have moved into wiki format.&lt;br/&gt;http://cgeerg.wikispaces.com/&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And here is one I am currently working on transferring over to a wiki&lt;br/&gt;http://eslrg.wikispaces.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iris: when I started several years ago, I had one general Research Guide for my department…..Graduate Education. Our Grad Ed program has many facets, such as ESL, MAED, EdD, Masters in Teaching, and Environmental Education.  As you can imagine, the Environmental Education students are going to be needing something a bit different from our ESL people, so I have been over the last few years, designing Research Guides for each general area.  I am also starting to move these into a wiki format. Now, the guides I do have usually have an index to their specific resource needs: reference, web, articles, books, etc…I have also started to think of them as “one stop shopping” for the students.  If they were/are going to bookmark one page from the library, I would like it to be the research guide.  I have also started, with the wiki, to start off with a question, such as “Looking for Articles?” “Where are the databases?” “How do get books from other libraries?”, etc…as opposed to just a heading with a list of resources to follow. I  think part of the reason for doing that, is that some people might not understand a heading like “databases” or “interlibrary loan”.  Anyway, here is one of them that I have moved into wiki format.<br /><a href="http://cgeerg.wikispaces.com/" rel="nofollow">http://cgeerg.wikispaces.com/</a></p>
<p>And here is one I am currently working on transferring over to a wiki<br /><a href="http://eslrg.wikispaces.com/" rel="nofollow">http://eslrg.wikispaces.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

