On the Messiness of Real Work

I was updating my about me page on my professional web site this morning (an activity I engage in far too rarely), when it suddenly struck me how untidy my professional self is. I don’t mean that I have a messy desk (though at the moment there are two piles of papers and journals waiting to be sorted and acted upon). I don’t even mean that I don’t have any focus in my professional activities. What I mean is that many of the groups of people I work with and many of the projects we work on are never named and defined. Half the time I don’t know if I’m on a “committee,” a “working group,” a “task force,” or just a project, duty, or standing meeting. I don’t know what my new job helping to coordinate the activities at the Research/IT desk is called. Basically, I do a lot of things with a lot of people, and we get things done, but we rarely stop to define exactly where we fit into the structure and operations of the library or the campus.

And aside from the somewhat arbitrary decisions I make when trying to tell other people what I do, I’ve decided that this state of affairs is just fine with me. I’d much rather spend the time meeting and doing rather than waiting for formal charges to committees or writing project reports. I enjoy working at a place where people say, “Sure, let’s work on that. How’s next Tuesday for everyone?” and then proceed to meet regularly for a year or so to get whatever-it-is done. I just hadn’t realized until today how few formal names I had for the groups I’m on.

Drum Roll Please….

For the first time in about 10 months, my post on the possibility of an open database of book cover images is NOT the most clicked-upon post in my ouvre. (Statistics are always from the past 5 to 6 weeks, or however long it takes for 2000 page-loads. In this case it goes back to the 1 week of July.) What caused this upset in the natural order of things? This month’s conversation about books and ebooks. How interesting.

Reinventing Quiet

For the last several years, our library has attempted to describe the level of socialization and group activity that happens on each of our four levels by defining them as “Crime Scene Investigation Quiet,” “Water Cooler Quiet,” “Nature Film Narrator Quiet,” and “Monetary Quiet.” (Here’s my previous post on the topic.)

Well, this year, we had to revamp the signs anyway because the food and beverage policy changed. We also realized that pre-work-life students had been consistently confused by “Water Cooler Quiet,” and CSI isn’t quiet as popular as it was a few years ago. So we revamped the top two levels.

“Blue Monday” or rather “Goodbye Blue Monday” is a coffee shop and popular hangout in town. The noise level is generally fairly high, but there’s almost always work going on. Students go there if they want to work on projects together or do homework while socializing at the same time. In other words, precisely what we want to recreate on the main floor of the library.

One floor down, we want to encourage group work and talk, but with more restraint than on 4th. Group work happens, but not as much socializing. This was by far the hardest floor to name. What conveys work being done, talk, but restraint? We decided on “2a Discussion Group Quiet.” On our campus, 2a refers to the second class time-slot on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Imagine being the professor leading discussion before 10am… yes, now you see why we chose that time-slot. Discussion happens, but not boisterously.

Students told us not to mess with Nature Film Narrator Quiet or Monastery Quiet, so we didn’t. Down on first, if you type too loudly somebody might just pass you a note (rather than whisper) saying that you should respect the needs of your fellow sleep-, light-, and food-deprived students as they labor through their comps research.